come think with me

one letter a week.

the word for one feeling you’ve had but couldn’t name.

no spam. unsubscribe anytime · read one first

the shelf · one month, eleven books

eleven romance novels in one month, read while writing one

I read eleven romance novels in August. I was drafting my own the whole time, which is the only reason the list looks like this: three by the same author back to back, one I picked up purely as research, and one about marrying somebody so they can stay in the country, read in the month I was writing one of those.

This is not a list of recommendations and it would be a bad one. Four of the eleven sit under 3.90 on Goodreads, several have sex on the page, and one of them is not really a romance at all. It is a record of what I actually read and what I actually thought, with the number I gave it.

Underneath each one is a note in the margin, which is the part the video could not carry: what the publisher's copy actually says, where I got a name or a job wrong on camera, the award that is a nomination rather than a win, and the content warning that belongs on a book and did not get one. One of those warnings matters more than all the rest and it is on Things You Save in a Fire.

Two of the eleven I had not finished when I filmed, and they are marked. A book you are halfway through cannot be judged on its ending.

the video i read 11 romance books while writing my own watch on youtube ↗

the eleven

In the order I read them. The star rating is mine and it is only there where I actually gave one out loud.

Roomies Christina Lauren · 2017

i gave it 3.5 goodreads 3.75 from 93,069 under 3.90

a green card marriage, read on purpose in the month i was writing one.

I listened to the audiobook. Holland gets rescued on the subway by a busker called Calvin, she gets him an audition on Broadway, and then it comes out that he's been in the country illegally on an expired student visa. So she marries him. I started it because the book I'm writing is also about the green card situation. I'm Romanian, I want to live here, and I have thought about what marrying somebody for papers would actually mean. Not the moral part so much as the money part, and the what if this person isn't a good person part. It was nice. It wasn't spectacular.

the lensattraction tangled up with paperwork

Two things the video didn't have. The first is that it was nearly a film: in 2018 Andy Fickman was attached to direct with Jenna Dewan producing, and Christina Lauren, who are two people, were to write the screenplay themselves. It never came out. The second is a caveat about the premise. The problem in the book is an expired student visa and work authorisation, not a border, and Calvin is Irish, which is the cheapest version of this story America tells: no detention, no consular interview, no deportation flight. And Holland is already in love with him and hiding it, so it isn't a cold arrangement between strangers either.

heaton-page sex

content note: a violent assault in a subway station, on the page, early.

This Book Made Me Think of You Libby Page · 2026

goodreads 4.30 from 150,137

her husband died five months ago and left her twelve books, one a month.

This one tickled every bookish part of my brain. Tilly gets a call from her local bookshop saying there's a birthday present waiting for her, and the present is from her husband, and her husband died five months ago. It's twelve books he chose before he died, one for each month of her first year without him. I think every single person who loves books will love this book. It's such a unique concept and such a beautiful one.

the lensbeing known by somebody who is not there

There is a second engine in it she didn't mention, and it is the thing that decides whether you pick it up: Tilly starts vlogging the year of reading, gets a following, and Alfie, who owns the bookshop, is in it alongside her. The publisher's own copy ends on whether a year of books can show her how to love again. So it is a romance with a living love interest, not only a grief novel about a dead husband. It came out on 3 February 2026, so she was right that it's new. One correction she made herself mid-sentence on camera: the call comes from the bookshop, not the library.

heatno on-page sex that could be established

content note: grief, and specifically the recent death of a spouse.

Archer's Voice Mia Sheridan · 2014

i gave it 3 goodreads 4.15 from 721,181

i'm asexual and i read it for the spice, as research for a scene i don't know how to write.

I read this because there's a scene in my book that's more explicit and it's an important scene, and I don't experience those things, so I wanted to know how you write it. A woman moves to a small town in Maine to get away from what happened to her father, and she meets Archer, who doesn't speak to anyone. Very slow burn, and it's old, about twelve years. I wouldn't say I loved the writing. I loved the idea of it. Somebody who has lived their whole life by themselves, and then a person arrives and they start working out what a life outside their own house could look like. That's not really my cup of tea, so the three is me and not the book.

the lensthe isolated one, reached

Her summary is gentler than the book. Bree's father didn't simply die: the publisher's own first-person copy is the sound of rain, the blood, the coldness of a gun. He was shot and she was there. Two useful things for anyone buying it. The 2016 Forever reissue carries an extended epilogue from Archer's point of view that the 2014 self-published original doesn't have, so the silent character finally narrates, and which edition you buy changes how much of him you get. And a warning about using it the way she did: it is marketed as an emotional slow burn, which is a hard place to go shopping for craft on one explicit scene, because the scene lands late and is carrying two hundred pages of restraint.

heatexplicit, and it is why she picked it up

content note: a parent shot on the page in front of the heroine, gun violence. The hero’s muteness is written as a wound healed by a woman’s love, which some disabled readers find hard.

Fake Skating Lynn Painter · 2025

goodreads 4.24 from 134,708

i know nothing about hockey. i got here through a tv show and stayed.

I don't know anything about hockey. I only started reading hockey romance because I watched Off Campus and loved the show. Dani and Alec were completely inseparable as children until Dani moved away and stopped replying to his letters. She comes back to Minnesota for her senior year and the soft nerdy boy she knew is now a hockey star in a town that worships them. I don't want to say too much about it. It's a very easy read and a very beautiful read and I really enjoyed it.

the lensthe childhood friend, returned as a stranger

The hook her summary stops short of is the one the title is naming: the two of them end up playing boyfriend and girlfriend. It is a fake-dating book. It also won the Goodreads Choice Award for Young Adult Fiction in 2025, after Painter was nominated twice in the same category the year before and lost both times, and Sony has the film with Will Gluck producing, who made Easy A and Anyone But You. One honest note on the heat: her read that it's closed door matches the category and the children's imprint, but no publisher or reviewer statement confirms it, so it is her read rather than a fact. And the reverse warning matters more. Painter's adult books under the same name are explicit, so somebody who loves this and picks up the next Lynn Painter off the shelf can land somewhere very different.

heatyoung adult, and closed door as far as she read it

The Rom-Commers Katherine Center · 2024

i gave it 3.5 goodreads 4.04 from 259,913

the one that started the rabbit hole, and the one of the three i liked least.

The first Katherine Center I read was The Bodyguard, and that was a different month, and I really loved it. This was the second. Emma has spent her entire life writing romantic comedies and caring for her father full time, and she gets six weeks in LA to rewrite a script for her screenwriting idol, and when she gets there he doesn't want to write with her. I don't know if I liked it as much as The Bodyguard. I did like the idea of writing partners, and how hard it actually is for writers to co-author, because I think it's very hard. He doesn't believe in love and she spends the book getting him to.

the lenstwo people who make the same thing

Here is the thing that answers her own complaint. The Rom-Commers isn't a sequel to The Bodyguard, but it is set in the same Hollywood: Charlie Yates wrote the screenplay that made Jack Stapleton famous, and Jack, the hero of the book she loved, walks through this one. Center says on her own site that they're separate and can be read in either order. So the book she liked less is built on top of the one she liked more. One correction worth making because it is the kind of thing that turns into a false claim: it was a finalist for the 2025 Audie Awards, not a winner, and Goodreads prints the award with no qualifier at all.

heatlow, and the publisher copy gets no further than a kiss

content note: a parent with a serious ongoing illness, and the exhaustion of full-time caring.

The Love Haters Katherine Center · 2025

i gave it about 3.5 to 4 goodreads 3.79 from 168,516 under 3.90

she says she can swim. she cannot swim. he rescues people from the sea.

Katie has to go to Key West to profile a Coast Guard rescue swimmer, and the catch is that she can't swim and she doesn't say so until she already has the job. He's also the brother of the coworker who got her the job, and the two of them do not get on, for a very good reason. I really enjoyed this. A beautiful story, cute and cosy, but nothing super special. He's a very hot, very caring guy who is in love with his dog. And I was writing a swimming scene at the time, so now there's a swimming scene in my book, which I think is funny.

the lensthe lie you tell to get in the room

Katie is a video producer rather than a journalist, which is a small fix with a point to it: the job is to produce the profile, not to write it. The dog is a rescue Great Dane. The interesting thing here is a split. The trade loved it, number seven on the New York Times hardcover list, an Amazon Editors' pick for 2025, and Publishers Weekly saying this may be Center's best yet. Readers did not: it is the lowest-rated of her three most recent novels, under The Rom-Commers and under Hello Stranger. Ria landed with the trade and against the crowd, and the crowd's objection is probably the premise, because a woman lying about being able to swim to get embedded with sea rescue professionals is something a reader either forgives in chapter one or never forgives.

heatsome, probably mild. the publisher copy gets as far as stolen kisses

content note: a near-drowning is implicit in the premise, which matters if water frightens you.

Things You Save in a Fire Katherine Center · 2019

i gave it 4 goodreads 4.01 from 193,506

the one that got to me, and the one this list has to warn you about.

Cassie is one of very few women in her Texas firehouse and she is very good at other people's emergencies. Then her estranged mother asks her to move to Boston, and she gives up her whole life and everything she has built in her career, for an old-school firehouse that does not believe women can be firefighters. Her old captain's advice was never date firefighters. And then there's a rookie, and he broke my heart, and I fell in love with him, and I was crying. Knowing that he gets hurt at some point made me very sad. I'm not going to spoil anything.

the lenscompetence as armour

This is the one place where going only on what the video said would do a reader harm, so here is the rest of it. The book is not built on the mother. On Cassie's sixteenth birthday her mother left, and hours later a boy she had a crush on assaulted her. She decided love was for the weak, replaced it with muscle, and went into rescue. Ten years later she is collecting a service award and comes face to face with him, loses her composure, and that is what sends her to Boston. The firehouse is the consequence. The assault is the cause. The rookie is Owen Callaghan, and the reason he hurts is that a budget cut makes the two of them compete for one spot on the crew.

heatlow. the copy goes no further than the rookie being dreamy

content note: sexual assault in the backstory and its aftermath, parental abandonment, workplace harassment and hazing, fire and injury on the page.

Love, Theoretically Ali Hazelwood · 2023

i gave it 4.5 goodreads 4.08 from 750,564

i asked my physics friends whether the feud was real. it is.

Elsie is an adjunct theoretical physicist who pays her rent working as a fake girlfriend for hire, being whichever version of herself the client wants her to be. Then the brother of her favourite client turns out to be the experimental physicist who ruined her mentor's career, and he's on the hiring committee for her dream job at MIT. I didn't know there was so much beef between theoretical and experimental physics, and then I talked to my physics friends and they told me it's actually all true. The conflict in this is so healthy, the way they talk about things and the way they solve things. It's one of my favourite Hazelwoods. It is a little bit spicy, so be careful with that.

the lenstwo clever people, being clever at each other

Her friends were right, and the joke is a century old. Physics has been split between theorists and experimentalists since the twentieth century, and James Clerk Maxwell was writing about the tension long before that. The best version of it is the Pauli effect: Otto Stern became so convinced his equipment would stop working if Wolfgang Pauli, a theorist, were in the room that he asked him to stay out during important experiments, and Pauli's colleagues named it a second exclusion principle, under which a functioning device and Wolfgang Pauli may not occupy the same room. The honest half of the answer is that the same sources call the relationship symbiotic. It is a cultural divide and a running joke, not a feud where one physicist ends another's career, and the novel turns the dial up because a romance needs an obstacle. One more thing: Hazelwood has a doctorate in neuroscience and was a working professor until 2022, so the adjunct precarity is written from inside the job.

heaton-page sex. her own words were a little bit spicy, be careful

content note: workplace power imbalance, academic precarity and money stress.

You'd Be Home Now Kathleen Glasgow · 2021

i gave it 4 goodreads 4.13 from 87,828

it is shelved next to the romances and it is not one. the addiction is the book.

This isn't really a romance. There's some romance in it, kind of as a subplot, but it's mostly about the problems you can have in high school. Emory has always been told who she is and where she should go and what clubs she should be in. She's the rich one, she's the hot sister's sister, she's the sister of a brother struggling with drug abuse. Then a car accident kills a girl and shows the whole town how bad her brother's addiction really was, and he goes to rehab, and he comes back, and she has to figure out who she is now. I really loved how it portrayed the bad parts of being in a rich family that owns a lot of a town. There are a lot of warnings on this one.

the lenswho you are once the role is taken away

The author is Kathleen Glasgow. On camera it comes out as Katherine and then Caitlin, which is worth fixing here because it is the name you would type to find it. The brother is Joey, the girl who dies is Candy MontClaire, and the town is Mill Haven. The formal thing nobody tells you: the publisher says plainly that it is inspired by Thornton Wilder's Our Town, which is why the book keeps pulling away from Emory to the town itself and the people at its edges. If you know that, the drift reads as the design rather than a loose plot. Glasgow was a poet and nothing else before her first novel, and she ran the University of Minnesota's creative writing MFA for thirteen years.

heatno on-page sex that could be established

content note: drug addiction and relapse, rehab, the death of a teenage girl in a car accident, grief, parental neglect inside a wealthy family.

Let's Talk About Love Claire Kann · 2018

goodreads 3.69 from 11,673 under 3.90 i had not finished it

the ace one, and the one with a hundredth of the readers.

I'm halfway through this one. Alice's girlfriend broke up with her when she said she was asexual, and it had happened before, so Alice decides she's done with dating. Then she meets Takumi at the library and gets the rom-com feelings she didn't ask for. I'm loving it so far. I love the ace representation, especially at the beginning, where it really sets the vibe for how asexual people actually see the world and how we experience it. There's a lot of relatable stuff written in here. I don't know if I love the writing style a lot. And I'm halfway, so this is not a verdict.

the lenswanting somebody without wanting that

Takumi works at the library with her, which her summary doesn't quite say. It was nominated for the Goodreads Choice Award for Young Adult Fiction in 2018, which means a novel with an openly asexual lead reached the public ballot of the biggest reader-voted award there is, in its first year. And then there is the number that is the reason this page exists. Of these eleven books, two have passed seven hundred thousand ratings. This one has fewer than twelve thousand. Nothing is claimed here about Claire Kann herself, because her current bio, her publisher bio, her Goodreads page and her YouTube channel say nothing about her orientation or her race, and a live source is the bar for writing about a real person.

heatno on-page sex

content note: acephobia on the page, and a relationship ended over somebody’s orientation.

Give Me a Reason Jayci Lee · 2025

i gave it probably 3 or 3.5 goodreads 3.39 from 1,094 under 3.90 i had not finished it

i could not work out why they love each other. that turns out to be austen’s fault.

I'm almost done with this one. It's a modern retelling of Jane Austen's Persuasion. Anne gave up the person she loved and went to Korea to be a K-drama actress, and she comes back ten years later and they end up at the same wedding, her as a bridesmaid and him as a groomsman, and they broke it off very badly. I don't think I loved it. I really love the yearning and there's a lot of yearning in it. What I couldn't work out is why they love each other. The book keeps telling me how much they do and never why. I think some backstory would have been interesting and I've only had one backstory moment so far. Probably a three or a three and a half.

the lensthe one you gave up for a good reason

Her complaint is sharper than she gives herself credit for. Anne is Austen's Anne Elliot and Frederick is Captain Frederick Wentworth, named straight out of the source, and Persuasion never shows you the courtship either. Austen starts eight years after the engagement is broken and the entire romance happens in retrospect, unspoken. So the gap she is describing is the gap in the original. That doesn't make the book work for her, and it shouldn't: her three stands. It just makes the objection a real observation about the form. The rating here also needs reading carefully. It is the lowest of the eleven and it is built on about a thousand readers, which is a different kind of number from one built on seven hundred thousand, and it moves much more easily.

heatprobably on-page sex. the author brands her work as sexy contemporary romance

content note: family financial ruin, and the pressure of family obligation.

what a month of them actually taught me

Reading eleven of anything in four weeks does something a single book cannot. You stop seeing the story and start seeing how it is built. Three of these are by Katherine Center, read back to back, and the honest question after the second one is not whether she is good. It is whether you love her more each time or whether you have started watching the machinery move.

The other thing a month of them shows you is where the intimacy is kept. Almost none of these books put the weight of the relationship in a sex scene. They put it in a letter chosen before somebody died, in a rivalry across a hiring committee, in two people made to compete for one job, in a man who cannot speak. That is the same argument I make about romance books with no sex scenes, and I did not go looking for it here. It just kept happening.

One coincidence that is not mine, because the research found it rather than I did: two of the eleven have a firefighter at the centre. Things You Save in a Fire and Give Me a Reason, in the same four weeks, with no intention behind it at all.

And one number worth sitting with. Of these eleven, two books have passed seven hundred thousand ratings on Goodreads. The one with an openly asexual lead has fewer than twelve thousand. That gap is not a judgement on the writing, and I have my own reservations about the writing. It is just what the shelf looks like when you stand back from it.

keep going: the twelve i read in September looking for my own book, which is the same habit with a question in it · romance books with no sex scenes, which is the list sorted by what you are actually after · the love stories i recommend · the seven kinds of attraction · the whole shelf, sorted by what is wrong

the book links are affiliate links. i earn a small commission and it costs you nothing extra.

come think with me

one letter a week.

the word for one feeling you’ve had but couldn’t name, and why it works that way. once a week, nothing else.

  • one letter a week, about a ten minute read
  • all nine printable workbooks, free
  • the research, with its caveats kept in
  • hit reply and it reaches me. i read every one

no pressure, no spam, no gatekeeping. unsubscribe anytime · riadumitrescu.substack.com

all of this is free and it stays free. if it gave you a word you didn’t have, you can buy me a coffee.